Chapter 3924 Whose Question
The City of Night is cruel, but using annual income division is more attractive than using bloodline division, otherwise the ancient Athens and the Renaissance would not have been blown to heaven by the West.
For those who are controlled by blood, Night City is a place of enlightenment and civilization. Even if the poor are suffering, everyone only thinks that they are incompetent and that they will definitely become successful if they go to Night City.
Before entering the casino, gamblers think that they will win money, and Night City is a big casino. At least you have the qualifications to serve in the Night City, and in other places, the qualifications to serve are restricted to death.
Of course, the underlying logic of annual income is actually bloodline, because means of production can be inherited. No matter how hard people who do not have means of production work hard, they cannot compare to those who have means of production. The means of production will not be transferred for no reason, and are usually passed down by the father.
Perhaps someone can have a great fortune and succeed below, so if he doesn't look at his bloodline, he will have the opportunity to establish legitimacy.
Everyone cannot change their bloodline, but they can change their annual income. Even if they commit crimes, as long as they can make money, they are yearning for and respected.
As for the 'the wine and meat smell smelly, the road is frozen to death', it has never been the disadvantage of Night City. It is the standard for distinguishing people with ability and incompetent. People with ability should have wine and meat smelly, and people with lack of ability should have frozen to death bone.
The rich people have no obligation to solve social problems.
Only Dongda University will require the monarch, minister, father, son and son to do a good job in the monarch, ministers do a good job in the work of the minister, and father and son also do their own work well. Only Dongda University will require the monarch, ministers, father and son to follow the example of the wise ancestors. .
Confucius proposed that the king, ruler, minister, father, father, son and son did not put forward a specific standard, but said that everyone should be benevolent, righteous, propriety, wise and trustworthy, but thieves also have the truth, and robbers are also benevolent, righteous, propriety, wise and trustworthy.
The king, the king, the minister, the father, the father, the son, the son, the son, the son, the minister, the minister, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, the son, and the son, the king, the minister, the minister, the father, the son, and the son, the son, and the son, the benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom and trustworthiness.
At this time, Mencius put a patch on it, asking everyone to follow the example of good people and do good deeds, and those who do not do good deeds can replace them. Only when standards are established can everyone supervise each other and make demands on the king and father.
The specific requirement put forward at the beginning was the response of heaven and man, that is, the emperor must be responsible for natural disasters, and if there is natural disaster in a place, it must pay for it. So when the emperor was rich, the saints would come out of the Yellow River Qing Dynasty, and when the emperor had no money, the dynasty would change.
After all, the emperor can take money from everyone and invest money in infrastructure. Not every emperor can do it, if you can't do it, get out.
Since the emperor has an obligation, he will naturally make demands on the nobles, and make a judgment on "everyone will pay the money together" and "whoever uses it will pay the money". If a noble blindly emphasizes that "whoever uses and pays for it" can be replaced and must also bear part of the obligation to "everyone pays for it together".
Therefore, Dongda University asked the rich people to solve the problem. It is the responsibility of the rich people to have frozen bones on the road, which is the standard for judging whether the rich people have legality.
But in other places, there is no such requirement. If you have frozen bones on the road, it is the responsibility of frozen bones. Why do you appear in a place where you freeze to death?
It’s like a Western firefighter said, “If you are in danger, it’s not the firefighter’s problem, it’s your problem, why are you in a place where firefighters can’t rescue?”
This is nothing wrong with the words. The rich people have no obligation to help the frozen bones. The frozen bones appear in a place where they will be frozen to death, and it has nothing to do with the rich people.
Then someone will ask, how can I get a place that does not freeze to death if I freeze my bones?
You can steal, rob, or buy it in zero yuan.
Then someone will ask, what should the person who was robbed, stolen, or cheated?
That is because you are incompetent, you should be stolen, robbed, or cheated, and you should become frozen to death. If you die, a fellow Taoist will not die. This is the basic survival rule.
Everyone competes for resources and controls resources. Whoever can’t compete or control it is incompetent. Being able to seize and control resources means having the ability.
The more resources you control, the more annual income you have, the more capable you are.
But if there are famines, floods, wildfires, earthquakes, terrorist attacks and other incidents occur, no one will solve the problem, because everyone's obligation is to control resources, not to take out resources.
Of course, the Chinese people also know that cooperation is needed. The Chinese people and Chinese people can control the black materials from each other through Loli Island, understand each other through the student fraternity, learn and cooperate through training sports, and of course they can also directly join the army.
If a rich family wants to cooperate with ordinary people, they need religion.
Some people are very opposed to religious ethics. After all, religion also has restrictions on aristocrats. If the people are organized by religion, they will have an impact on the rich.
Therefore, in order to break religious ethics, the nobles also worked very hard. But the needs of the people are here. Even if the nobles oppose it, the people still need to join forces. Religion is definitely not the worst choice.
Religion is also very good at seizing resources and controlling resources. So the nobles have to fight against religion because this is a peer. But when the president takes office, he needs to swear according to the Bible. Because the Bible can suppress the nobles to a certain extent.
The parliament is a game of three controls five, five controls nine, so to suppress three, the Bible is undoubtedly the best choice.
This is also very contradictory. The nobles want to suppress religion and borrow religion to balance the relationship between everyone. It can be said that it is very contradictory, but that's it, because the nobles hope that the fellow Taoist will die and will not die, but no one can guarantee that it is not that the fellow Taoist will die and will not die. Everyone wants to rob resources and is also the target of being robbed. .
When robbing others, it is disgusting that religion is inappropriate. When robbed, you will hope for religious protection.
Therefore, the nobles who have the advantage will desperately destroy religious ethics, and the weak side must use religion to protect themselves. The two sides kept pulling and confronting each other.
No mistakes, one song, one content, one in 6, one book, one bar, one reading!
Religion is not inherited by blood. It does not depend on bloodline, but on everyone’s understanding of doctrine. Therefore, religious churches run schools and pass on doctrines.
Of course, religion does not have the obligation to solve social problems. The main obligation of religion is to make more people believe in religion, rather than solve problems. Any problem is God's test and does not need to be solved, it only requires patience.
Buddhism believes that all problems are entanglements of the human heart. As long as you let go, the world will be empty, all dreams and bubbles. Let go of your greed for fame and fortune, and let go of your fear of birth, old age, sickness and death, are all false.
Religion will not require the rich to solve the problem. The rich people are a more cost-effective choice between solving problems and religion. Solving problems is really too expensive and difficult.
To solve the problem, we need to first solve the contradiction between "everyone pays money together" and "whoever uses it will pay money". If we need everyone to pay money together, we need to solve the trust problem and the subsequent distribution problem must also be solved, otherwise good things will turn into bad things.
After solving these problems, you have to tighten your belt to do hard and tiring work. Someone needs to do all kinds of work. It is really hard and tiring. Even this generation has enjoyed the benefits of solving problems and won the next generation. Only then can you enjoy it.
The process of solving problems is very long and there are no dividends immediately.
We need to let everyone rob together, and if they rob, there will be dividends and everyone will continue to do so. But it would be too difficult if everyone tightened their belts together.
So it is more convenient to rob. If you rob, you will be divided. If you can't rob, you will be disbanded. If you go back, you will be together. Everyone will go back and go through their own ways and rob their neighbors next time. If you can't grab the enemy, you can steal the neighbors. There is no problem for them, because grabbing and controlling resources is their ability. It is not their obligation to solve the problem.
"The City of Night is heaven and hell. People who master resources can do whatever they want, because they only need to enjoy it, and there is no way to restrain them. But for people who do not have resources, they deserve it if they die, and they are incompetent, not Other people's fault. If David hadn't picked up military technology, he would have been better than his mother. In order to seize and control resources, his mother could be said to have moved three times. "Duran believes that David's ability is not as good as his mother.